Which seven-seater SUV is better to buy in 2024? The Skoda Kodiaq or the Nissan X-Trail.

Surprisingly, there aren’t as many SUV alternatives available with seven seats inside. No matter the brand or model, purchasing a car will come with a hefty price tag because there are very few models that offer 2+3+2 seat arrangements in the interior, and they are often D-segment cars or above.

Nonetheless, the Skoda Kodiaq and the Nissan X-Trail are now two of the most intriguing SUVs available if you want one with seven seats. To assist you in making the greatest choice possible today, we will carefully examine each model, allowing you to select the one that best fits your demands and price range.

Skoda Kodiaq 2024 dimensions

Just a few months ago, the Czech company unveiled the second version of the Skoda Kodiaq, which is still their largest SUV. This latest iteration, which comes in five- and seven-seat configurations, is built on a 2,791-mm wheelbase chassis and measures 4,758 mm in length, 1,864 mm in width, and 1,656 mm in height.

On the other hand, the Nissan X-Trail is the Japanese automaker’s largest SUV choice and is also a new-generation vehicle. The latest generation’s external dimensions are as follows: it has a wheelbase of 2,705 mm, measures 4,680 mm in body length, 1,840 mm in width, and 1,710 mm in height. It is also available with five or seven seats.

Trunk

This time, we are just considering the seven-seater versions of each of them regarding trunk capacity. Consequently, the Skoda model has a trunk capacity of 340 litres when all seven seats are in use, 845 litres when the second row is folded down, and 2,035 litres when the two front seats are the only ones in use.

With seven seats in use, the Nissan model’s trunk has a volumetric capacity of 120 litres. When there are just two rows, the cargo capacity rises to 485 litres, and when there are only two front seats accessible, the volume may reach 1,300 litres.

Nissan X-Trail engines

Two engine options for the Kodiaq are a 2.0 TSI 204 HP and a 1.5 TSI 150 HP Mild Hybrid petrol engine with an ECO environmental badge. Two 2.0 TDI diesel with 150 HP and 193 HP are also available, along with a 204 HP plug-in hybrid with Zero label and more than 100 km of autonomy. There are front-wheel drive and four-wheel drive models, and the changes are automated DSG.

In the meanwhile, the four-wheel drive’s mechanical range). Everybody has an automatic gearbox as standard equipment and the DGT ECO badge. Notable features like 18-inch wheels, LED headlights, a 10-inch digital instrument panel, electric mirrors, a wireless charging station, three-zone climate control, and a multimedia system with a 13-inch touch screen and mobile connectivity are all included in the Skoda Kodiaq (Selection finish)’s standard equipment list. Regarding the Nissan signals, full LED headlights, back camera, and 8-inch touch screen, among other things.

Prices

The seven-seat Selection version of the 2017 Skoda Kodiaq, which comes equipped with a 150 HP 1.5 TSI micro-hybrid gasoline engine, a seven-speed DSG automatic gearbox and the DGT’s ECO environmental designation, starts at 45,425 euros in Spain.

In summary

First, let’s compare the two seven-seater SUVs’ external measurements. The Skoda Kodiaq has an 86mm larger wheelbase than the Nissan X-Trail, but it is also 78mm longer, 24mm broader, and 54mm lower than the Japanese SUV.

Regardless of the version’s seat arrangement, the new Kodiaq 2024 has a larger volumetric capacity than the X-Trail because of the difference in external dimensions and Skoda’s skill in maximising trunk space. seven stools.

However, the Kodiaq offers a wider and more varied selection of engines, including a long-range plug-in hybrid, a traditional petrol engine, and diesel engines. The X-Trail has somewhat greater maximum power and can use the e-Power variants.

Though there is a noticeable price differential that leans the scale in favour of the Nissan model—its entry-level model with seven-seat interior costs up to 12,000 euros—the basic equipment is rather extensive in both situations. less expensive than the range’s most affordable seven-seat Skoda Kodiaq. And the difference in buying price is substantial.

Leave a Comment